Has anyone else noticed the trend that posting about your cool papers might lead to rejection?
The call for papers states: “Topics of interest include all aspects of computer vision and pattern recognition.”
My paper is about computer vision and pattern recognition because it introduces new methods that improve how computers see and recognize patterns, based on needs from another field.
If you just apply a classic computer vision method to another field without making significant changes, your paper will be rejected because it belongs to that other field. However, if you make changes to computer vision methods based on needs from another field, your paper should be accepted.
What is the highest rating and confidence score possible?
It seems paradoxical but can happen due to various reasons: oversharing can invite premature critique, reveal work before it’s polished, or imply hubris. Academic circles value discretion and peer review’s impartiality. Moderation in sharing can protect research integrity and prevent premature judgments.